What I’m reading Part Two: “Righting Feminism”

I picked up this book purposefully. My intent was to learn about women’s organizations that hold completely divergent viewpoints from my own. Righting Feminism by Ronnee Schreiber fulfilled that purpose.

Taken from Amazon.com
Taken from Amazon.com

Schreiber is a professor of Political Science. Her focus, much like this book, is divergent from my chosen educational focus. Or so I would have thought until I came to realize that feminism is one of the largest, ongoing social and political movements that America has ever experienced.

I don’t plan to debate definitions of women’s movements, when they began, if they are necessary, even how or who defines them. I am a feminist. I have considered myself a radical feminist ideologically, although reading current feminist blogs, social media, news articles and commentary makes me feel that I don’t fit that label, if it’s a label that is even still in use. For now though, it is the closest identity I can use to define my viewpoint although I will qualify that statement with the fact that I see a troubling trend toward blame, overt hostility, and unbending positional rhetoric among many feminists.

I am also an atheist, a declaration that is still hard to write in print as I feel this designation carries much more stigma in our society than my identification with the feminist movement. Simply put, in my viewpoint, the basis of most monotheistic religions stems from a fundamental need to control a given society. What better way to structure power relations than to create an overarching, unseen supreme deity who heralds salvation by compliance.

American patriarchal social order relies heavily on the existence of such a deity. Perhaps I should specify that statement to say the belief in such a deity. Most of both early and current feminist ideology is clearly counter to the beliefs and goals of the followers of our conservative patriarchal social order. Conservative women’s organizations, namely the two outlined in Schreiber’s book: Concerned Women for America (CWA), and the Independent Women’s Forum (IWF), have attempted to do their best to use many of the issues concerning feminists to reframe, rework, and reapply the most pressing political issues facing women in our society.

Schreiber covers the process by which both of these organizations began. The CWA has roots in the suffrage movement of the 1920’s with opposition groups strongly opposed to women converging into the male-centric public sphere. They also can claim idealistic association with groups who advocate and condone many forms of social isms: racism, sexism, ageism, maternalism, and of course conservatism.

I am going to utilize the descriptive components associated with each group from Schreiber’s own overview.
The CWA was founded in 1979  and it’s mission is “to protect and promote biblical values among all citizens–first through prayer, then education, and finally by influencing our society–thereby reversing the decline in moral values in our nation” (Schreiber, 2008, p. 26). The IWF, founded in 1992 is based on libertarian premise of limited government, free markets and strong national defense. It’s mission being to “rebuild civil society by advancing economic liberty, personal responsibility, and political freedom” (Schreiber, 2008, p. 26).

Gender identity politics play a large part in the activism of CWA as they promote a decidedly traditional view that gender is not a social construct but a biological fact. IWF tends to lean somewhat away from labels of identity, choosing to stress individualism and determination, however they are capable apparently of using gendered promotion when needed to advance their goals.

Schreiber provides insight into both organizations views and policy work regarding issues of violence against women, motherhood, and women’s health concerns. She contrasts both groups, and closes the book with some insight (current as of the writing of this book) into both Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann, two females who may be deemed as figureheads among conservative groups such as these.

My opinions have not changed regarding the viewpoints and goals of groups such as these. I do feel that I have a clearer picture of their focus, the initial impetus for and background behind conservative groups pushing alternatives to feminism, and the ability of all activist organizations (feminist as well as conservative) to use skillful rhetoric to push political agenda.

Coming to a clearer understanding of the other side makes my position crystal clear.

*Schreiber, R. (2008). Righting Feminism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “What I’m reading Part Two: “Righting Feminism””

  1. This post is really interesting. re: the freelance writing comment of part 1: I also have no idea how all that works, but I do think there’s room for a voice filling in the picture, laying out what the ‘other’ side believes, and why, and also (based on the other books you picked out) incorporating non-white viewpoints as well. It’s so easy to fall into an echo chamber and never hear the other voices – someone who could distill them for the white mainstream feminist audience offers something valuable, I think. But I don’t mean to bully you! Reading and writing as you’re doing now is more than enough, I just sense in your debates about whether or not to go to grad school a desire to have a larger purpose, and this seems like an achievable one — if it intrigues you.

    Like

    1. Lots to think on, and I appreciate the divergent path you suggest as your perceptive powers are extremely spot on–I am finding myself purpose driven with all this academic influence. With that said, my own visions have centered on a more active role if you will, hands on in some capacity I think. Doing is something attainable in my line of sight. Writing, being opinionated, and distilling others views seems to me to belong to the world of learned academics leaving me an improbable candidate at this point. My personal evaluation of my knowledge base (and confidence level) is not adequate, possibly provoking the distorted view that I NEED further enlightenment in the hallowed halls of higher education?? prior to anyone taking me seriously…

      Like

Love to hear from you!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s